Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 23:03:21 GMT -5
ARomanian state at the date of entry into force of Law no. such as those in the present case cannot be acquired as a vacant inheritance by an administrativeterritorial unit. . By Civil Sentence no. of November the Covasna Court admitted the action and annulled Decision no. of January issued by the defendant Local Council of Sfntu Gheorghe Municipality. . The court held in essence that in the case it is incident to art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions and with regard to art. of the same law to which the text.
Above refers even if in its initial wording it did not expressly show what Country Email List form the property acquired by the administrativeterritorial unit over this category of real estate will take being able to conclude from the form of the text that they became private property at the date of issuance of the contested administrative act it is clear and unequivocal in the sense that these buildings fall under the public ownership of the administrativeterritorial unit and not in the private domain. The court considered that art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions makes express reference to art. of the same law only with regard to the establishment of the legal regime that the lands that become the.
Property of communes cities or municipalities will have otherwise the text of the norm is explicit regarding the object of the public property right namely the lands owned by the state located in the inner city of the localities and which are under the administration of the town halls on the date of this law.... The court did not retain the defendants defense regarding the repeal of art. of Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions by art. . of the Civil Code because on the.
Above refers even if in its initial wording it did not expressly show what Country Email List form the property acquired by the administrativeterritorial unit over this category of real estate will take being able to conclude from the form of the text that they became private property at the date of issuance of the contested administrative act it is clear and unequivocal in the sense that these buildings fall under the public ownership of the administrativeterritorial unit and not in the private domain. The court considered that art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions makes express reference to art. of the same law only with regard to the establishment of the legal regime that the lands that become the.
Property of communes cities or municipalities will have otherwise the text of the norm is explicit regarding the object of the public property right namely the lands owned by the state located in the inner city of the localities and which are under the administration of the town halls on the date of this law.... The court did not retain the defendants defense regarding the repeal of art. of Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions by art. . of the Civil Code because on the.